Banned Book Club Selections

Created on September 11, 2024, 3:35 pm

Last Updated September 11, 2024, 3:38 pm

Titles read by the Medford Library Banned Book Club since inception.
Series
Time quintet volume 1
Notes
Accused of being both anti-religious and anti-Christian, some parents claimed that the novel promoted witchcraft.
Description
Notes
Banned in 1955 in South Africa for being “obscene” and containing “indecent” material. Controversial in US due to portrayal of the death of a child,
Description
Series
Giver quartet volume 1
Notes
frequently attracted objections due to its “mature themes”, including suicide, sexuality, and euthanasia.
Description
Notes
The book stirred controversy because it depicted the graphic and horrific consequences of the bombing, which included the immediate and long-term impact on people's lives. The details and personal stories in the book made it difficult for some people to read and comprehend, especially considering the devastating nature of the event.
Description
Notes
Banned and challenged for profanity, violence, and it was thought to promote an anti-police message and indoctrination of a social agenda
Description
6) Sold
Notes
Claimed to be sexually explicit, rape
Description
Notes
Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content and for being sexually explicit
Description
8) Speak
Notes
Thought to contain a political viewpoint, and it was claimed to be biased against male students.
Description
Notes
Claiming it was filled with sexual conduct and depictions of ***
Description
10) Crank
Series
Crank trilogy volume 1
Notes
Drug use, sexually explicit 
Description
Notes
Depictions of abuse, sexually explicit
Formats:
Description
Notes
Sexually explicit, LGBTQIA content
Description
Notes
Too much graphic information (NOTE: Challenge to this title brought backlash to the parent) 
Description
Series
Maus volume 1
Notes
Profanity, image of female nudity, depiction of surviving Polish-Jews (Also banned in Russia due to violating anti-*** propaganda laws).
Notes
Controversial due to political leaders. Some called it toxic propaganda, and others said it supported antiracist education
Description
Notes
Profanity, sexual reference, racial slurs, and allegations of Sexual misconduct by the author
Description
Notes
Sexually explicit, graphic language, socialist-communist agenda, racism and abuse
Description
Notes
Anti-American, Anti-Christian, Anti-Semitic, explicit sexual scenes, violence, and obscene language
Description
Description
Notes
LGBTQIA + content, sexually explicit images
Description