The Judge in a Democracy
(eBook)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Published
Princeton University Press, 2009.
Status
Available Online

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Format
eBook
Language
English
ISBN
9781400827046

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Aharon Barak., & Aharon Barak|AUTHOR. (2009). The Judge in a Democracy . Princeton University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Aharon Barak and Aharon Barak|AUTHOR. 2009. The Judge in a Democracy. Princeton University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Aharon Barak and Aharon Barak|AUTHOR. The Judge in a Democracy Princeton University Press, 2009.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Aharon Barak, and Aharon Barak|AUTHOR. The Judge in a Democracy Princeton University Press, 2009.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Go To Grouped Work

Grouping Information

Grouped Work IDe4b6b590-1da6-8532-51a7-ad178161c98e-eng
Full titlejudge in a democracy
Authorbarak aharon
Grouping Categorybook
Last Update2023-09-04 18:05:16PM
Last Indexed2024-03-27 06:29:02AM

Book Cover Information

Image Sourcehoopla
First LoadedJun 22, 2022
Last UsedApr 3, 2023

Hoopla Extract Information

stdClass Object
(
    [year] => 2009
    [artist] => Aharon Barak
    [fiction] => 
    [coverImageUrl] => https://cover.hoopladigital.com/pup_9781400827046_270.jpeg
    [titleId] => 13282615
    [isbn] => 9781400827046
    [abridged] => 
    [language] => ENGLISH
    [profanity] => 
    [title] => The Judge in a Democracy
    [demo] => 
    [segments] => Array
        (
        )

    [pages] => 368
    [children] => 
    [artists] => Array
        (
            [0] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [name] => Aharon Barak
                    [artistFormal] => Barak, Aharon
                    [relationship] => AUTHOR
                )

        )

    [genres] => Array
        (
            [0] => Constitutional
            [1] => Democracy
            [2] => International
            [3] => Law
            [4] => Political Ideologies
            [5] => Political Science
        )

    [price] => 1.49
    [id] => 13282615
    [edited] => 
    [kind] => EBOOK
    [active] => 1
    [upc] => 
    [synopsis] => "Aharon Barak, Winner of the 2006 Gruber Justice Prize, Peter Gruber Foundation" Aharon Barak is President of the Supreme Court of Israel. He is the author of Judicial Discretion (1989), Purposive Interpretation in Law (Princeton, 2005), several books in Hebrew, and numerous articles in English-language law journals. 
	Whether examining election outcomes, the legal status of terrorism suspects, or if (or how) people can be sentenced to death, a judge in a modern democracy assumes a role that raises some of the most contentious political issues of our day. But do judges even have a role beyond deciding the disputes before them under law? What are the criteria for judging the justices who write opinions for the United States Supreme Court or constitutional courts in other democracies? These are the questions that one of the world's foremost judges and legal theorists, Aharon Barak, poses in this book.



  In fluent prose, Barak sets forth a powerful vision of the role of the judge. He argues that this role comprises two central elements beyond dispute resolution: bridging the gap between the law and society, and protecting the constitution and democracy. The former involves balancing the need to adapt the law to social change against the need for stability; the latter, judges' ultimate accountability, not to public opinion or to politicians, but to the "internal morality" of democracy.



  Barak's vigorous support of "purposive interpretation" (interpreting legal texts--for example, statutes and constitutions--in light of their purpose) contrasts sharply with the influential "originalism" advocated by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.



  As he explores these questions, Barak also traces how supreme courts in major democracies have evolved since World War II, and he guides us through many of his own decisions to show how he has tried to put these principles into action, even under the burden of judging on terrorism. "Aharon Barak [states] that it is precisely because judges are not politicians that they are the right people to undertake the constitutional role of ensuring that the legislature and the executive comply with legal requirements. . . .   Barak points out that tension between the courts and other branches of government is natural and it is desirable. If the courts' decisions were always welcomed by the executive, judges would not be doing their job properly. Barak's thesis is . . .  of fundamental importance."---David Pannick, Times of London "Learned and perceptive, this work deserves the attention of any reader interested in the role that judges play, and ought to play, in a democratic republic."---Charles Gardner Geyh, Trial "Barak sets out in a systematic way, the questions, dilemmas and solutions he has adopted as a judge. He notes the principles that should guide judges in a democratic society, when faced with constitutional questions that have implications over and above the specific concerns of the parties to a legal disput. . .  . [E]ngaging and intellectually stimulating. . . .  The Judge in a Democracy should be a must read in any course or research on judicial and constitutional politics."---Menachem Hofnung, Law and Politics Book Review "Barak argues for striking a balance between the protection of human rights and the preservation of national security interests, but is most adamant in insisting that some degree of security might have to be sacrificed in order to preserve a nation's democratic essence.... Barak has done much to humanize the role of the judge. He describes the process of interpreting law as a profoundly human one, in which the adjudicator is constantly balancing, testing, agonizing."---Benjamin Soskis, Forward "The Judge in a Democracy explains that there was nothing in either the US or the Israeli constitutions allowing judges to strike down acts of the legislature. Even so, he says, the courts in both countries have held that judicial review of legislation is implied b
    [url] => https://www.hoopladigital.com/title/13282615
    [pa] => 
    [publisher] => Princeton University Press
    [purchaseModel] => INSTANT
)